更新时间:2013-04-22
Kaminari • 未作回答的问题：伯恩斯坦哈佛六讲:D/L + 结语
传了飞速网的
1-3课
91cf7ac0-aa61-11e2-99a5-0015c55db73d/
4-6课
f4d9acd4-aa94-11e2-b24a-0015c55db73d/
中字差爆~开头还能看看越后来越瞎污搞 （买菜回家四个大字还执着的悬在视频上）
但做个精准的中字绝对是个大工程了，还不说各种语言的引经据典，教授口若悬河频频书面长句蹦出来也真是本事
之前听人推荐说看前四课，但其实第五第六课仅仅作为20世纪音乐入门都很有趣！
我觉得最好看的反而是后三课。
结语摘录 来自
http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2013/04/19/leonard-bernstein-harvard-future-of-music-1973/
I believe that a great new era of eclecticism is at hand — eclecticism in the highest sense — and I believe that it has been made possible by the rediscovery, the reacceptance of tonality, that universal earth out of which such diversity can spring. And no matter how serial, or stochastic, or otherwise intellectualized music may be, it can always qualify as poetry, as long as it is rooted in Earth. … I believe that from that Earth emerges a musical poetry, which is by the nature of its sources tonal. I believe that these sources cause to exist a phonology of music, which evolves from the universal known as the harmonic series — and that there is an equally universal musical syntax, which can be codified and structured in terms of symmetry and repetition; and that by metaphorical operation, there can be devised particular musical languages that have surface structures noticeably remote from their basic origins, but which can be strikingly expressive as long as they retain their roots in Earth.
I believe that our deepest affective responses to these languages are innate ones, but do not preclude additional responses, which are conditioned or learned; and that all particular languages bear on one another and combine into always-new idioms perceptible to human beings; and that ultimately these idioms can all merge into a speech universal enough to be accessible to all mankind; and that the expressive distinctions among these idioms depend ultimately on the dignity and passion of the individual creative voice.
And, finally, I believe that all these things are true, and that ［the］ “unanswered question” has an answer. I’m no longer sure what the question is, but I do know the answer — and the answer is, “Yes.”
1-3课
91cf7ac0-aa61-11e2-99a5-0015c55db73d/
4-6课
f4d9acd4-aa94-11e2-b24a-0015c55db73d/
中字差爆~开头还能看看越后来越瞎污搞 （买菜回家四个大字还执着的悬在视频上）
但做个精准的中字绝对是个大工程了，还不说各种语言的引经据典，教授口若悬河频频书面长句蹦出来也真是本事
之前听人推荐说看前四课，但其实第五第六课仅仅作为20世纪音乐入门都很有趣！
我觉得最好看的反而是后三课。
结语摘录 来自
http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2013/04/19/leonard-bernstein-harvard-future-of-music-1973/
I believe that a great new era of eclecticism is at hand — eclecticism in the highest sense — and I believe that it has been made possible by the rediscovery, the reacceptance of tonality, that universal earth out of which such diversity can spring. And no matter how serial, or stochastic, or otherwise intellectualized music may be, it can always qualify as poetry, as long as it is rooted in Earth. … I believe that from that Earth emerges a musical poetry, which is by the nature of its sources tonal. I believe that these sources cause to exist a phonology of music, which evolves from the universal known as the harmonic series — and that there is an equally universal musical syntax, which can be codified and structured in terms of symmetry and repetition; and that by metaphorical operation, there can be devised particular musical languages that have surface structures noticeably remote from their basic origins, but which can be strikingly expressive as long as they retain their roots in Earth.
I believe that our deepest affective responses to these languages are innate ones, but do not preclude additional responses, which are conditioned or learned; and that all particular languages bear on one another and combine into always-new idioms perceptible to human beings; and that ultimately these idioms can all merge into a speech universal enough to be accessible to all mankind; and that the expressive distinctions among these idioms depend ultimately on the dignity and passion of the individual creative voice.
And, finally, I believe that all these things are true, and that ［the］ “unanswered question” has an answer. I’m no longer sure what the question is, but I do know the answer — and the answer is, “Yes.”
