| 更新日期 | 2023-10-19 12:10:23 |
| 片名 | 大鸟和小鸟(1966) |
| 又名 | The Hawks and the Sparrows / 鹰与麻雀 |
| 导演 | 皮埃尔·保罗·帕索里尼 / |
| 主演 | 托托 / 尼内托·达沃利 / 费米·贝努西 / Umberto Bevilacqua / Renato Capogna / Alfredo Leggi / Pietro Davoli / 雷纳托·蒙塔尔巴诺 / Rosina Moroni / Flaminia Siciliano / Lena Lin Solaro / Gabriele Baldini / Giovanni Tarallo / Ricardo Redi / Vittorio Vittori / 罗萨纳·迪罗科 / Cesare Gelli / 维托里奥·拉帕利亚 / Francesco Leonetti / 多明戈·莫都格诺 / 菲德斯·斯塔尼 / |
| 类型 | 剧情 / 喜剧 / 奇幻 / |
| 制片国家 | 意大利 |
| 语言 | 意大利语 / |
| 上映日期 | 1966-05-04(意大利) |
- 资源名
- viinas.com.uccellacci e uccellini (1966) .mkv fullhd 1080p hevc x265 ac3 ita....无中字
- 类型
- HD/1080
- 大小
- Hash
- D923DBF10B6974F1D74CE9DC0017F08FBF803B05
剧情介绍
Joe This richly symbolic film is really impossible to understand without some knowledge of 20th Century Italian history, and particularly the power of the Roman Catholic Church. The Lateran Treaty of 1929 finally politically separated Italy from Church power by creating the Vatican as a sovereign state. But the trade off was the that the Church was still left in power over many aspects of everyday Italian life. For instance, Italy finally established a civilian divorce law through a bitterly contested 1970 referendum. Before then, divorce was under strictly in the domain of Church law, and the Church NEVER granted a divorce, even in extreme cases like when a spouse was abandoned many years hence. Overall, however, the power of the Church still resided in the blind allegiance of Italians at all levels to Church morality. Over decades, this led to impeding Italy's social and political progress, and greatly maintained the status quo in the division between the privileged upper class & the downtrodden masses. The Leftist & Communist movements that began after WWII battled against this status quo, and indirectly against the Church through Progressive agendas. ALL This doesn't even amount to an adequate thumbnail of all the issues that this film touched upon. Pasolini really needed to couch this head-on criticism of contemporary Italian society in a comedy, because I suspect that at some level he would have feared for his life had he delivered a more serious work covering the same controversial topics.